{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"klartext-jura.de","provider_url":"https:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura","author_name":"klartext-jura","author_url":"https:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura\/author\/klartext-jura\/","title":"Die Pr\u00fcfung der Verh\u00e4ltnism\u00e4\u00dfigkeit - klartext-jura.de","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"bjvVNfQRpp\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura\/2014\/12\/01\/die-pruefung-der-verhaeltnismaessigkeit-2\/\">Die Pr\u00fcfung der Verh\u00e4ltnism\u00e4\u00dfigkeit<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura\/2014\/12\/01\/die-pruefung-der-verhaeltnismaessigkeit-2\/embed\/#?secret=bjvVNfQRpp\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8222;Die Pr\u00fcfung der Verh\u00e4ltnism\u00e4\u00dfigkeit&#8220; &#8211; klartext-jura.de\" data-secret=\"bjvVNfQRpp\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"In der R\u00dc 9\/2014 besch\u00e4ftigt sich Gr\u00fcnder auf den Seiten 597ff mit dem Abschleppen verbotswidrig an einem Taxenstand parkender Fahrzeuge, im konkreten Fall eines Busses. Dabei stellt sich insbesondere das Problem der Verh\u00e4ltnism\u00e4\u00dfigkeit. Dazu leitet Gr\u00fcnder auf S.","thumbnail_url":"http:\/\/bloghosting.jurmatix.de\/klartext-jura\/files\/2014\/12\/Hund-289x300.png"}